Note
Go to the end to download the full example code. or to run this example in your browser via JupyterLite
Basics & Model Specification of AdversarialFairnessClassifier#
This example shows how to use
AdversarialFairnessClassifier
on the UCI Adult
dataset.
First, we cover a most basic application of adversarial mitigation. We start by loading and preprocessing the dataset:
from fairlearn.datasets import fetch_adult
X, y = fetch_adult(return_X_y=True)
pos_label = y[0]
z = X["sex"] # In this example, we consider 'sex' the sensitive feature.
As with other machine learning methods, it is wise to take a train-test split of the data in order to validate the model on unseen data:
The UCI adult dataset cannot be fed into a neural network (yet),
as we have many columns that are not numerical in nature. To resolve this
issue, we could for instance use one-hot encodings to preprocess categorical
columns. Additionally, let’s preprocess the numeric columns to a
standardized range. For these tasks, we can use functionality from
scikit-learn (sklearn.preprocessing
). We also use an imputer
to get rid of NaN’s:
import sklearn
from numpy import number
from sklearn.compose import make_column_selector, make_column_transformer
from sklearn.impute import SimpleImputer
from sklearn.pipeline import Pipeline
from sklearn.preprocessing import OneHotEncoder, StandardScaler
sklearn.set_config(enable_metadata_routing=True)
ct = make_column_transformer(
(
Pipeline(
[
("imputer", SimpleImputer(strategy="mean")),
("normalizer", StandardScaler()),
]
),
make_column_selector(dtype_include=number),
),
(
Pipeline(
[
("imputer", SimpleImputer(strategy="most_frequent")),
("encoder", OneHotEncoder(drop="if_binary", sparse_output=False)),
]
),
make_column_selector(dtype_include="category"),
),
)
Now, we can use AdversarialFairnessClassifier
to train on the
UCI Adult dataset. As our predictor and adversary models, we use for
simplicity the default constructors for fully connected neural
networks with sigmoid activations implemented in Fairlearn. We initialize
neural network constructors
by passing a list \(h_1, h_2, \dots\) that indicate the number of nodes
\(h_i\) per hidden layer \(i\). You can also put strings in this list
to indicate certain activation functions, or just pass an initialized
activation function directly.
The specific fairness
objective that we choose for this example is demographic parity, so we also
set objective = "demographic_parity"
. We generally follow sklearn API,
but in this case we require some extra kwargs. In particular, we should
specify the number of epochs, batch size, whether to shuffle the rows of data
after every epoch, and optionally after how many seconds to show a progress
update:
from fairlearn.adversarial import AdversarialFairnessClassifier
mitigator = AdversarialFairnessClassifier(
backend="torch",
predictor_model=[50, "leaky_relu"],
adversary_model=[3, "leaky_relu"],
batch_size=2**8,
progress_updates=0.5,
random_state=123,
)
We now put the above model in a Pipeline
with the transformation step. Note
that we use scikit-learn
’s metadata routing to pass the sensitive feature:
.. GENERATED FROM PYTHON SOURCE LINES 107-112
from sklearn.pipeline import make_pipeline
pipeline = make_pipeline(ct, mitigator.set_fit_request(sensitive_features=True))
Then, we can fit the data to our model:
pipeline.fit(X_train, y_train, sensitive_features=Z_train)
Finally, we evaluate the predictions. In particular, we trained the predictor for demographic parity, so we are not only interested in the accuracy, but also in the selection rate. MetricFrames are a great resource here:
predictions = pipeline.predict(X_test)
from sklearn.metrics import accuracy_score
from fairlearn.metrics import MetricFrame, selection_rate
mf = MetricFrame(
metrics={"accuracy": accuracy_score, "selection_rate": selection_rate},
y_true=y_test == pos_label,
y_pred=predictions == pos_label,
sensitive_features=Z_test,
)
Then, to display the result:
print(mf.by_group)
# The above statistics tell us that the accuracy of our model is quite good,
# 90% for females and 72% for males. However, the selection rates differ, so there
# is a large demographic disparity here. When using adversarial fairness
# out-of-the-box, users may not yield such
# good training results after the first attempt. In general, training
# adversarial networks is hard, and users may need to tweak the
# hyperparameters continuously. Besides general scikit-learn algorithms
# that finetune estimators,
# :ref:`adversarial_Example_2` will demonstrate some problem-specific
# techniques we can use such as using dynamic hyperparameters,
# validation, and early stopping to improve adversarial training.
accuracy selection_rate
sex
Female 0.906308 0.978664
Male 0.723336 0.484927
Total running time of the script: (0 minutes 11.795 seconds)